The central irony, for anyone who is not a Christian believer, is that the living Jesus of the Synoptics does not believe he is the Incarnation of Yahweh, and least of all at the moment of his death, when he despairingly asks his abba why he has been abandoned. Death and stories of ressurrection make Jesus a Name Divine from prior to St. Paul onward, and necessarily the transition from Yeshua of Nazareth to Jesus Christ was performed by those who first accepted the Apostle Paul's conversion. The Christian historical scholars who most persuade me - Father John Meier and E. P. Sanders - are not ironists and they differ on their receptivity to the supernatural, accepted by Meier on grounds of Catholic faith but largely avoided by Sanders, whose Jesus remains firmly Jewish, though as so autonomous a charismatic that he constitutes his own authority, transcending Tanakh. Sanders gives us a Jesus who had an unmediated relationship with Yahweh - perhaps not unique, since prophets on to John the Baptist possessed the same attribute.»
Harold Bloom, Jesus and Yahweh, The Names Divine
Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário